3 ms·
> this is a good thing, as the state has a monopoly on use of force i disagree that its a good thing. The threat of a minor altercation from property owners he
by devmunchies 6y ago
> this is a good thing, as the state has a monopoly on use of force
i disagree that its a good thing. The threat of a minor altercation from property owners helps maintain stability (emphasis on minor).
And the state having a monopoly on violence changes the dynamic of property, where the government can take whatever it wants from me (even my children) if they want to dream up a reason.
- krapp 6y ago>And the state having a monopoly on violence changes the dynamic of property, where the government can take whatever it wants from me (even my children) if they want to dream up a reason. On the other hand, without the state having a monopoly on violence, anyone has the right to take whatever they want from you, given sufficient force.