3 ms·
> While prosecutors have not provided specifics, tools designed to make women appear nude in images with the aid of artificial intelligence (AI) do exist. They
by im3w1l 6y ago
> While prosecutors have not provided specifics, tools designed to make women appear nude in images with the aid of artificial intelligence (AI) do exist.
They may be able to generate a "plausible" nude, suitable for rubbing one out. But it's not a real nude. Moles and scars wont match. The data is just not there, so the manipulator has to make something up. Thus I think the nudes are actually the most promising for conclusively proving or disproving a manipulation.
- lazide 6y agoHard to disprove without stripping naked for a court witness though, which is a pretty high degree of ‘shitty’ that would be easy to cause. Especially if you used a ton of stolen bikini photos to generate the deep fake. Not a lot of skin that wouldn’t exactly match, and the parts that don’t would definitely not be for public consumption.
- lurquer 6y agoDon’t now why you’re getting downvoted. This happens. Particularly in rape cases where the woman (or child) describes some particular feature on the alleged rapists genitals. Michael Jackson had to strip down, as I recall. Obviously not in open court.
- jjk166 6y agoYou don't need to strip naked, you just need to show one discrepancy. Cut a hole in a pair of cheap jeans where you have a mole that's not in the video.
- lazide 6y agoHardly - almost none of the video we’re talking about has that type of resolution, it’s easy to ‘paint on’ something like a mole or a birthmark, compression side effects can nuke some pixels, etc. You’d spend a lot of time and effort explaining one mole difference - and that’s if you legitimately had one. If you didn’t, what else are you going to go on?
- Karawebnetwork 6y agoThe video in this story seems to be quite low resolution and from a distance. Scars and moles are pretty much invisible in this situation.