You used the word creepy to describe the wikifeet site, which might lead people to think that you are motivated by prudish reasons. From a legal consent perspe

You used the word creepy to describe the wikifeet site, which might lead people to think that you are motivated by prudish reasons. From a legal consent perspective are you also opposed to google image search for the same reasons, that google did not get consent to redisplay the resulting images? What about pictures of public personas in news articles where consent was not given? Could I prevent my friends from posting unflattering pictures of me? What if I google images of feet to get off on? Maybe consent should apply to audio and written information, so people are not quoted out of context? The legalities around consent seem to get complicated, and conflict with other legal precedent. Also you might have a hard time convincing other people of the harm in feet pics, and that might be the first thing you need to do to get a law passed against it.