> None of this was considered a real violation of privacy, or at least I never heard anyone really express any concerns about it. Unlisted phone numbers were a

> None of this was considered a real violation of privacy, or at least I never heard anyone really express any concerns about it. Unlisted phone numbers were a thing, but very few people had them and it cost extra to have one. Most people wanted to be in the phone book so others could contact them. Yes, and I think it was wrong to do so. I think it's ridiculous to be worried about websites tracking one's noncorporeal identity tied to an integer on the internet compared to that everyone in my sport's club can easily retrieve my physical place of residence.