4 ms·
At that point, we’re already changing the name, so why not go all the way?
by 6gvONxR4sf7o 6y ago
At that point, we’re already changing the name, so why not go all the way?
- forgotpwd16 6y agoNot really. Basically not at all. In bibliography I bet few, if any, times Coq's pronunciation is mentioned. The only thing changing will be in presentations and conversations where the name is a problem.
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 6y agoThe vast majority of my communication is verbal, and that includes technical communication. "Only" isn't really "only."
- forgotpwd16 6y agoNot sure what's the problem then as, based on that, changing just the pronunciation should be fine.