3 ms·
Yes? How does that relate to what I said?
by iudqnolq 6y ago
Yes? How does that relate to what I said?
- Grustaf 6y agoYou said that since they solved it by changing miss to ms, that means that miss was actually wrong. This is not true. Besides the fact that miss does NOT mean child, what they did was a workaround. They solved it that was because it was simpler. It doesn't indicate that they think miss = child is correct. Most likely they didn't even have access to the code.