4 ms·
The existence of more dangerous jobs is not an indicator that the job in question is not dangerous. This is especially true when the number of more dangerous jo
by cgriswald 6y ago
The existence of more dangerous jobs is not an indicator that the job in question is not dangerous. This is especially true when the number of more dangerous jobs are a small percentage of all jobs. The linked article is literally titled “Top 25 Most Dangerous Jobs in the United States,” so his own source says the job is dangerous.
Whether the job is dangerous or not is in part fact (by whatever metric you choose) and in part where you draw the line (which is largely arbitrary but may have some statistical support).
If I were to stipulate the metric of fatalities, I would still conclude the job is dangerous because I consider construction work dangerous and it has fewer fatalities per capita.
Whether it is appropriate to throw parades or not for any of these groups doesn’t have an impact on the veracity of the claim.
- arcticbull 6y agoI could rephrase what I said as "being a police officer is slightly less dangerous than being a crossing guard"