Comments on this reply seem to have forgotten two key things about python. 1) It’s batteries included. The standard library is a core feature, and it is extens

Comments on this reply seem to have forgotten two key things about python. 1) It’s batteries included. The standard library is a core feature, and it is extensive in order to reduce the number 3rd party library dependencies. 2) “There should be one— and preferably only one —obvious way to do it. Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.” The Pythonic way is to use the standard library, setup.py, pypi, and so on. Python is not Rust, or Node, or Clojure, or anything else. Do it Pythonicly and good things will happen. In the history of Python, it’s only because of the Zen’s guiding principles and the “come join us” attitude of the community that Python accidentally became “enterprise grade”. It succeeded in spite of the lack of Cargo or NPM, or (shudder) Mavin[, or CI/CD, or 3D game engines, or easy binary package productization, or everything else Python is obviously bad at]; almost precisely because it’s not those things. Python encourages me to get my task done, and all it asks is that I leave the flame wars at the door and embrace it for what it is. It saddens me to see so many people jump down zomglings throat for making the daring suggestion that Pythonistas use the language as designed. Because, he is absolutely right about this: “Complex is better than complicated.”