3 ms·

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_... CALEA legally o

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_... CALEA legally obligates Signal to provide the government a lawful interception methodology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Collection_System_Network https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Collection_System_Netw... If Signal is a government op or not is unclear but it's also unnecessary. All Americans by definition do not have privacy because the government can snoop. Signal pretty much doesnt need to be a government OP.

mr_woozy 6y ago
>CALEA legally obligates Signal to provide the government a lawful interception methodology. Common misunderstanding but incorrect. https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-real-reason-the-feds-cant-read-your-imessages https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-real-reason-the-feds-cant-rea... " Soghoian explained that communications, "encrypted with a key not known to the company […] cannot be intercepted." So in a situation where the decryption keys are handled on the device, and not by whomever is delivering the messages, then law enforcement must ignore the message entirely. "