12 ms·

> Is this worldwide or US? Worldwide. SMS is just like e-mail, you can put anything you want in the sender field. You should absolutely not trust SMS.

by Aaargh20318 6y ago

mrtksn 6y ago
Any idea on the extra security measures? In Turkey for example, when you change your SIM card the 2FA from the banks will stop working and you need to call your bank to re-activate it. That of course seems like a measure to prevent SIM cloning but maybe there are some security protections against spoofing. In many places SMS is a popular way to do payments and 2FA for high security applications.
- rincebrain 6y ago
  Where does SMS get used to do payments? (...and how?) SMS for 2FA is known to be a very bad idea, and some security experts have been shouting about the need to stop doing that for a while. I also can't see any country managing to implement more restrictions on SMS without either breaking a lot of "legitimate" sources of SMS or being ineffective outside of a very narrow window (e.g. only blocking forged SMS for numbers originating within one country)
  - e3bc54b2 6y ago
    > Where does SMS get used to do payments? (...and how?) In India, for every card transaction, for every DMAT transaction, for every password/PIN change SMS is used as 2FA. It is also mandated to require SMS 2FA for every one of these cases. If my bank has any means to use TOTP/Yubikey, it is absolutely not made obvious, led alone clear or even possible.
    - rincebrain 6y ago
      Okay, so SMS gets used as 2FA for all those things, not somehow a primary method of creating transactions, correct? Unfortunately, quickly looking, [1] suggests at least one of the listed services for sending arbitrarily forged SMS messages explicitly works in India, so it seems like this is still true for you. :( [1] - https://www.usethistip.com/5-websites-to-send-anonymous-or-fake-sms.html https://www.usethistip.com/5-websites-to-send-anonymous-or-f...
  - lucb1e 6y ago
    "Where?!" Everywhere. It's being phased out in many places, but as a rule of thumb, mostly everywhere still. "known to be very bad ... been shouting ..." Right, yeah, to put it in some perspective remember that you're talking second factor here. This is not your login, this is a secondary confirmation and you still need some serious motivation to bypass it. It's definitely doable, I work in security and I know what kind of attacks you're thinking of, but it's not the opportunistic kind of thing that a common thief will do without technical research and planning it out. If you know how to do it, you can probably find better jobs than this. It also doesn't scale well because you can only use it on people whose bank login you've already cracked in the first place.
    - rincebrain 6y ago
      I'd never seen or heard of it being used for payments before, which is why I asked - I'd heard of phone numbers being used as account names (effectively) in some payment systems, but being involved in the workflow of making payments is entirely novel to me. I'm aware it's not your login, but it feels the same as asking someone for publicly searchable information to "verify your identity" - an additional "security" step that doesn't actually slow down any attacker more dedicated than a passing whim, but makes people feel good about whoever is using it, when there are better options that don't have the problems of SMS. Yes, it doesn't scale well to bulk attacking, but most of my interactions are with people who take reasonable precautions like keeping their machines patched, not installing random crap from the internet, and generally avoiding other fun ways people get swept up in low-hanging fruit campaigns. SMS 2FA is better than no 2FA at all, it's just frustrating to watch many companies deploy it and go home when there are better options, some of which solely also require a phone. edited to correct my statement: I originally said "SMS 2FA is better than no 2FA at all in a number of cases", but no, I'm pretty confident it's strictly better, even with all my laments about it.
      - dividedbyzero 6y ago
        What better options are there that have approximately the same ease of use? SMS works with every conceivable phone, even most landlines if need be, users don't have to install a separate authenticator app, which may require a Google/iCloud password (now where did I put that post-it note?), that takes up space that may be scarce on low-end phones and that may not even be compatible with very old phones, leaving affected people in a really unsatisfactory spot. Then they need to set up codes for every login, figure out how to switch back and forth between apps and how to copy codes, which is not very discoverable at least in Google Authenticator – most people seem to memorize and type instead, cumbersome. Hardware tokens are even worse, people misplace those a lot and unless you are a bank with a mature process for issuing these, setup is probably even more of a hassle. All of this may be big deal if you (also) target less technical people and want them to use your product when they have the option not to. With SMS, all the user needs is a phone number. Pretty much everyone is familiar with that, most will readily share it, too. iOS will even extract codes and show them on top of the keyboard, just wait a second or two and tap the code, done. It's about as painless and frictionless as it can reasonably be, with apparently relatively inconsequential security drawbacks – given it's supposedly trivial to fake SMS, there don't seem to be a lot of people doing so at scale. Maybe a breach like this one will finally change that? Remains to be seen. For now I can totally see why one might stick with SMS as a second factor.
  - CaptainZapp 6y ago
    > Where does SMS get used to do payments? (...and how?) Look up M-Pesa[1]. Which is a hugely successful, mobile phone based payment system in multiple countries. In Kenya alone, where it started, it had 17Million subscribers. In 2011, that was. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-Pesa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-Pesa
- Nextgrid 6y ago
  Carriers can indeed expose APIs for banks and other third-parties to check if a SIM has recently been reissued, but that's a separate problem from spoofing.
74d-fe6-2c6 6y ago
Are there Android apps for that?
- v1nc 6y ago
  Hushsms is one, but requires Xposed Framework.
  - NavinF 6y ago
    Does that let you spoof sender address on any phone? I was under the impression that you had to create an account with a SIP provide to do that. (Btw a Google search for "Hushsms" results in shady/cancerous app stores that all seem to mirror each other. Where is the official website/thread?)
- escalt 6y ago
  I'm absolutely no expert on this, but I think your provider would usually filter this spoofing attempt out, just like with IP spoofing. But if you're in the right spot in the network (e.g. your provider doesn't check for spoofing or you're your own "provider") you can do whatever you want. Another problem with Android could be that the operating system might not have enough control over the SIM-Card/Modem to spoof phone numbers. I have heard about people using some services to send/call from spoofed numbers though
lmilcin 6y ago
Actually, I trust e-mail more than SMS. With e-mail at least you can look at the headers and if you know which part you can trust you can verify where it came from. With SMS there is no such possibility.
prower 6y ago
I'm pretty sure Italy requires a company to register to an official list before being able to put a personalized sender ID in your SMS communications. I'm not sure about the inner workings but seems far from "whatever you want". I kinda assumed this was a widespread modus operandi, apparently it's not?

> Is this worldwide or US? Worldwide. SMS is just like e-mail, you can put anything you want in the sender field. You should absolutely not trust SMS.

mrtksn 6y ago

Any idea on the extra security measures? In Turkey for example, when you change your SIM card the 2FA from the banks will stop working and you need to call your bank to re-activate it. That of course seems like a measure to prevent SIM cloning but maybe there are some security protections against spoofing. In many places SMS is a popular way to do payments and 2FA for high security applications.

rincebrain 6y ago
Where does SMS get used to do payments? (...and how?) SMS for 2FA is known to be a very bad idea, and some security experts have been shouting about the need to stop doing that for a while. I also can't see any country managing to implement more restrictions on SMS without either breaking a lot of "legitimate" sources of SMS or being ineffective outside of a very narrow window (e.g. only blocking forged SMS for numbers originating within one country)
- e3bc54b2 6y ago
  > Where does SMS get used to do payments? (...and how?) In India, for every card transaction, for every DMAT transaction, for every password/PIN change SMS is used as 2FA. It is also mandated to require SMS 2FA for every one of these cases. If my bank has any means to use TOTP/Yubikey, it is absolutely not made obvious, led alone clear or even possible.
  - rincebrain 6y ago
    Okay, so SMS gets used as 2FA for all those things, not somehow a primary method of creating transactions, correct? Unfortunately, quickly looking, [1] suggests at least one of the listed services for sending arbitrarily forged SMS messages explicitly works in India, so it seems like this is still true for you. :( [1] - https://www.usethistip.com/5-websites-to-send-anonymous-or-fake-sms.html https://www.usethistip.com/5-websites-to-send-anonymous-or-f...
- lucb1e 6y ago
  "Where?!" Everywhere. It's being phased out in many places, but as a rule of thumb, mostly everywhere still. "known to be very bad ... been shouting ..." Right, yeah, to put it in some perspective remember that you're talking second factor here. This is not your login, this is a secondary confirmation and you still need some serious motivation to bypass it. It's definitely doable, I work in security and I know what kind of attacks you're thinking of, but it's not the opportunistic kind of thing that a common thief will do without technical research and planning it out. If you know how to do it, you can probably find better jobs than this. It also doesn't scale well because you can only use it on people whose bank login you've already cracked in the first place.
  - rincebrain 6y ago
    I'd never seen or heard of it being used for payments before, which is why I asked - I'd heard of phone numbers being used as account names (effectively) in some payment systems, but being involved in the workflow of making payments is entirely novel to me. I'm aware it's not your login, but it feels the same as asking someone for publicly searchable information to "verify your identity" - an additional "security" step that doesn't actually slow down any attacker more dedicated than a passing whim, but makes people feel good about whoever is using it, when there are better options that don't have the problems of SMS. Yes, it doesn't scale well to bulk attacking, but most of my interactions are with people who take reasonable precautions like keeping their machines patched, not installing random crap from the internet, and generally avoiding other fun ways people get swept up in low-hanging fruit campaigns. SMS 2FA is better than no 2FA at all, it's just frustrating to watch many companies deploy it and go home when there are better options, some of which solely also require a phone. edited to correct my statement: I originally said "SMS 2FA is better than no 2FA at all in a number of cases", but no, I'm pretty confident it's strictly better, even with all my laments about it.
    - dividedbyzero 6y ago
      What better options are there that have approximately the same ease of use? SMS works with every conceivable phone, even most landlines if need be, users don't have to install a separate authenticator app, which may require a Google/iCloud password (now where did I put that post-it note?), that takes up space that may be scarce on low-end phones and that may not even be compatible with very old phones, leaving affected people in a really unsatisfactory spot. Then they need to set up codes for every login, figure out how to switch back and forth between apps and how to copy codes, which is not very discoverable at least in Google Authenticator – most people seem to memorize and type instead, cumbersome. Hardware tokens are even worse, people misplace those a lot and unless you are a bank with a mature process for issuing these, setup is probably even more of a hassle. All of this may be big deal if you (also) target less technical people and want them to use your product when they have the option not to. With SMS, all the user needs is a phone number. Pretty much everyone is familiar with that, most will readily share it, too. iOS will even extract codes and show them on top of the keyboard, just wait a second or two and tap the code, done. It's about as painless and frictionless as it can reasonably be, with apparently relatively inconsequential security drawbacks – given it's supposedly trivial to fake SMS, there don't seem to be a lot of people doing so at scale. Maybe a breach like this one will finally change that? Remains to be seen. For now I can totally see why one might stick with SMS as a second factor.
- CaptainZapp 6y ago
  > Where does SMS get used to do payments? (...and how?) Look up M-Pesa[1]. Which is a hugely successful, mobile phone based payment system in multiple countries. In Kenya alone, where it started, it had 17Million subscribers. In 2011, that was. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-Pesa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-Pesa
Nextgrid 6y ago
Carriers can indeed expose APIs for banks and other third-parties to check if a SIM has recently been reissued, but that's a separate problem from spoofing.

74d-fe6-2c6 6y ago

Are there Android apps for that?

v1nc 6y ago
Hushsms is one, but requires Xposed Framework.
- NavinF 6y ago
  Does that let you spoof sender address on any phone? I was under the impression that you had to create an account with a SIP provide to do that. (Btw a Google search for "Hushsms" results in shady/cancerous app stores that all seem to mirror each other. Where is the official website/thread?)
escalt 6y ago
I'm absolutely no expert on this, but I think your provider would usually filter this spoofing attempt out, just like with IP spoofing. But if you're in the right spot in the network (e.g. your provider doesn't check for spoofing or you're your own "provider") you can do whatever you want. Another problem with Android could be that the operating system might not have enough control over the SIM-Card/Modem to spoof phone numbers. I have heard about people using some services to send/call from spoofed numbers though

lmilcin 6y ago

Actually, I trust e-mail more than SMS. With e-mail at least you can look at the headers and if you know which part you can trust you can verify where it came from. With SMS there is no such possibility.

prower 6y ago

I'm pretty sure Italy requires a company to register to an official list before being able to put a personalized sender ID in your SMS communications. I'm not sure about the inner workings but seems far from "whatever you want". I kinda assumed this was a widespread modus operandi, apparently it's not?