This source seems a bit biased, so I tried to find an alternative one. I found the raw case here : https://casetext.com/case/bhattacharya-v-murray https://caset

This source seems a bit biased, so I tried to find an alternative one. I found the raw case here : https://casetext.com/case/bhattacharya-v-murray https://casetext.com/case/bhattacharya-v-murray To be honest, the raw case is even worse than the article. Little excerpt : > During Bhattacharya and Peterson's one-hour meeting, Peterson "barely mentioned" Bhattacharya's questions and comments at the panel discussion. Dkt. 33 ¶ 73. Instead, Peterson attempted to determine Bhattacharya's "views on various social and political issues—including sexual assault, affirmative action, and the election of President Trump." Id.