3 ms·
A more accurate parallel is posting images from social media to gay porn sites. Nothing is wrong with gayness or foot fetishism, but one can make a reasonable a
by Veen 6y ago
A more accurate parallel is posting images from social media to gay porn sites. Nothing is wrong with gayness or foot fetishism, but one can make a reasonable argument against using images for sexual gratification without the subject's knowledge or consent.
Personally, I don't think it can or should be policed. Any image could provoke a sexual response, and there's nothing to do about that short of not publishing images.
(also, some might object to your apparent conflation of homosexuality and fetishism).
- EveYoung 6y agoMy concern is more about being associated with a fetish site. If someone would republish pictures of my feet anonymously I could laugh about it, but I would be pretty upset if they post it with my name and birthday. I wouldn't want a WikiFeet page be the first thing my colleagues and clients see when they search my name. Even if I don't have a problem with it, others might and assume that those pictures where posted there by me.