4 ms·
A lot of Dutch people live in suburbs and work in cities, that explains the bulk of car traffic. If you look at trips within cities though, the bicycle has a mu
by xputer 5y ago
A lot of Dutch people live in suburbs and work in cities, that explains the bulk of car traffic. If you look at trips within cities though, the bicycle has a much larger portion. In Amsterdam 38% and in Groningen 57%:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_in_the_Netherlands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycling_in_the_Netherlands
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groningen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groningen
Comparing distance travelled is not really a useful metric in my opinion. Virtually no one is going to ride their bicycle 20-30 miles to work each day, when many people will happily travel this distance by car. It's for the short <5 mile trips that you want to incentivize people to take a bike instead of a car. That's where you have the most to gain in terms of making your city a more pleasant space to be.
- Tade0 5y agoFair point, but I believe distance still matters in terms of CO2. I don't see cycling as a serious proposition here, because it doesn't solve any new problem that isn't already handled by public transport.