6 ms·
That's a easy statement to make until you actually try to define what "some point" actually means.
by Goronmon 6y ago
That's a easy statement to make until you actually try to define what "some point" actually means.
- LudwigNagasena 6y agoWe agree that kids become adults at 18 and no one has a big problem with this. I don’t believe demarcating this “some point” is far more complicated.
- edoceo 6y agoPlease do it then. What is this mark? 80% of TAM? Revenue over $250k/yr/employee? 10000 users?
- LudwigNagasena 6y agoWe can start with companies with a market cap over $1bln for example. And tinker the policy based on empirical data.
- esyir 6y agoSure, 1 million users. You're free to quibble with the specifics, but there's your magical mark.
- ceejayoz 6y ago> We agree that kids become adults at 18 and no one has a big problem with this. We don’t, though. Can’t drink until 21. Rental cars and credit cards have extra restrictions until 25. Etc.
- LudwigNagasena 6y agoWe don’t what? Do you see many people who say that 6 year old kids should vote? Do you see many people who advocate that driving should be banned until 40? Do you think that credit card restrictions undermine the concept of the age of majority? No. We can put an arbitrary delimiter at first and argue about specifics later.
- ceejayoz 6y ago> Do you see many people who say that 6 year old kids should vote? There are indeed disagreements on the appropriate voting age. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/takoma-park-grants-16-year-olds-right-to-vote/2013/05/14/b27c52c4-bccd-11e2-89c9-3be8095fe767_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/takoma-park-grants-16-y... https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/125-democrats-and-1-republican-vote-lower-voting-age-16 https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/125-democrat... > We can put an arbitrary delimiter at first and argue about specifics later. We're in specifics territory, though.
- LudwigNagasena 6y ago> There are indeed disagreements on the appropriate voting age. Sure, but my question was about 6 year olds, not 16 year olds. > We're in specifics territory, though. Exactly. The first thing to do is to make sure that 6 year olds don’t kill anyone driving recklessly and 30 year olds can vote. The rest is specifics we can argue about. The same thing with the social responsibility of companies.