3 ms·
Well, the pros historically tend to leave out the, ah, pharmaceutical side of the equation when they write about "what they do".
by Igelau 6y ago
Well, the pros historically tend to leave out the, ah, pharmaceutical side of the equation when they write about "what they do".
- femiagbabiaka 6y agoThat's changing quite a bit, but agreed.
- Daho0n 6y agoThe talking yes but not the pharmaceutical side.
- gameswithgo 6y agoworse than that the stuff in magazines and such is often entirely fabricated
- nordsieck 6y ago> Well, the pros historically tend to leave out the, ah, pharmaceutical side of the equation when they write about "what they do". There are tested competitions. I'll admit that that doesn't guarantee that no one uses banned substances there, but the finalists are generally quite a bit smaller than those in the untested competitions, so at the very least they're substantially cutting back.
- fierro 6y agothe sentiment regarding steroid use is becoming less negative and stigmatic. A lot of older pros talk about it openly now (ex Dorian Yates) and a lot of current modern pros are openly disclosing their routines. Sponsors are becoming more tolerant of this as it's now as the honesty is now seen as cool and attracts an audience.