3 ms·
>"They should have just stopped extending it after C++11." For the uniformed such as myself, what happened beginning at C++14? What exactly was the fundamental
by bogomipz 6y ago
>"They should have just stopped extending it after C++11."
For the uniformed such as myself, what happened beginning at C++14? What exactly was the fundamental shift?
- ncmncm 6y agoIt is not really about the language at all. He got older, and does not want to learn new things. Other people who stopped learning earlier say, "better C" instead. The language has gotten continuously more powerful since 2011, albeit in smaller increments until C++20 when several big features landed. Good C++11 looks practically nothing like C++98, and good C++20 looks as little like C++11. It is really getting more fun all the time, as old crud falls away, and you can just say more and more just what you mean. Improved type-inference capabilities are doing a great deal of the heavy lifting.