3 ms·
I read your comment already. You talked about part of what the journalist quoted like it was all Stallman said. He went on to say he has some of the characteris
by pseudalopex 6y ago
I read your comment already. You talked about part of what the journalist quoted like it was all Stallman said. He went on to say he has some of the characteristics. He described how they affected his life. He discussed a book about subclinical mental disorders by Harvard psychiatry professor John Ratey. He suggested he might have what's called broader autism phenotype now.
The strongest plausible interpretation of what he said is he understood the distinction between clinical and subclinical presentations and the part about rhythm was incidental. It's clear he had some understanding at least. Insisting he must have thought rhythm was a diagnostic criterion and that completely invalidates his understanding is the weakest plausible interpretation at best.
- skissane 6y agoThe boundary between ASD and BAP isn't always clear even to experienced clinicians. Someone who isn't an experienced clinician, their judgement of which side of that line a person lies on is much more likely to be wrong. That's true even when the person in question is their own self. Given that, how much weight should we give to Stallman's opinion on the issue? And, this isn't directed at you personally, but I think a lot of people who bring "Stallman says he doesn't have it" into the argument don't display any awareness of the concept of BAP.