> decision making ... should not be automated by machines. There must be a mechanism in place which is open to scrutiny (preferably by a qualified human) and ac

> decision making ... should not be automated by machines. There must be a mechanism in place which is open to scrutiny (preferably by a qualified human) and accountability You're saying "I don't trust AI, I want human supervision", but this works both ways. Sometimes we don't trust the humans and would prefer a neutral AI. Humans do terrible things to other humans. Who's going to review my appeals? What are their biases? Are they any more trustworthy than a model?