4 ms·
Why isn't this actionable? We are currently making significant public and private investments into electric cars based on their reduced emissions. Why not also
by s0rce 6y ago
Why isn't this actionable? We are currently making significant public and private investments into electric cars based on their reduced emissions. Why not also invest in cycling infrastructure (beyond the very limited capacity that most US cities are currently doing)?
- phnofive 6y agoThere is no evidence to suggest millions of bicycle commuters are waiting in the wings for more green paint.
- pessimizer 6y agoI am. Cycling in the city is dangerous.
- VBprogrammer 6y agoAren't there studies that show the health benefits out weigh the dangers? I think the problem is more that it feels more dangerous and is, as a result, is often quite stressful.
- ahelwer 6y agoThat's the sort of comparison you can only make over the entire population. Looking at it from the perspective of an individual, it's a raw deal if my general fitness is improved but then two years later I get hit by a car and walk with a limp for the rest of my life. I do bike commute and lived in Seattle for 7.5 years without a car.
- bildung 6y agoThere is plenty of evidence from many cities around the world. Copenhagen is a rather famous example, their turnaround from being very car-centric to being very bike-friendly started in the 70s IIRC, and the transit patterns followed as planned.
- s0rce 6y agoThere actually is pretty significant evidence: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/climate/bikes-climate-change.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/01/climate/bikes-climate-cha... https://www.pnas.org/content/118/15/e2024399118 https://www.pnas.org/content/118/15/e2024399118 https://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/jpt16.4_Cervero.pdf https://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/jpt16.4_... https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2213624X20300183 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S22136... https://www.nar.realtor/blogs/spaces-to-places/bike-lanes-build-them-and-they-will-come https://www.nar.realtor/blogs/spaces-to-places/bike-lanes-bu... https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/january/cycling-along-barclays-cycle-superhighways-is-on-the-up https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/januar... (although you might be correct about green paint, thats fake infrastructure and paint won't protect people from getting hit by cars)
- elmomle 6y agoWhen it comes to transportation infrastructure, you certainly don't want to plan the future based on apparent present demand. Los Angeles vs Copenhagen is a great comparison of the results of continually building for what people seem to want "now" (in the former case) versus building to create a better future.
- clairity 6y agoLA actually has decent public transportation now, and it's getting better. it's also the perfect city for biking, with lower temperature variances, elevation variances, and precipitation rates than most cities. we just need to convert on-street parking into bike lanes everywhere, and we'd be all set (with protected lanes built out over time). LA may have been the poster child of poor planning in the 80's, but i'd suggest cities like phoenix, houston and atlanta have surpassed it in that regard.
- elmomle 6y agoAgreed, the city has made a lot of progress. I was indeed thinking of its planning for most of the 20th century!
- InitialLastName 6y agoAs they say, the power is in the marginal consumer. There are people who, given more bicycle infrastructure, will be helped over the threshold to riding a bicycle for more trips (I'm one of them; I will commute by bicycle, but the roads around me don't make riding home from a store with a trailer a safe decision). Also, painting more lines on a road is usually more of a half-hearted municipal response to requests for bicycle infrastructure; the changes that are established to improve ridership are physically separated bicycle lanes, the network effect of more cyclists, and holding drivers responsible when their behaviors kill or maim more vulnerable road users.
- cameronh90 6y agoNot green paint, but safe cycling infrastructure would absolutely convert my girlfriend to a cyclist. The amount of people who call me insane for cycling on London roads is no joke.
- twiddling 6y agoBecause most US cities are not compact and flat as Copenhagen
- helicalspiral 6y agoebikes, though a bit more expensive, make getting over the hills in even SF doable
- umeshunni 6y agoSF is a very compact city (7 miles across)
- com2kid 6y agoI'm not willing to spend thousands on an ebike while living in a city where I expect my bike to be stolen at least once a year. (and all of my bikes that were stolen, were stolen out of locked garages!)
- s0rce 6y agoEven 1 bike per year isn't that bad if you have insurance, car maintenance + depreciation is probably more. Not to mention when your catalytic converter gets stolen.
- twiddling 6y agoeBikes definitely help with the topography issues ( Seattle , Pittsburgh ). You still have the sprawl and separated land use patterns in a lot of cities though. Of course summer commuting in Houston or Phoenix is going to suck no matter what your bike is
- SketchySeaBeast 6y agoDon't ebikes bring in a lot of the enviromental concerns as an electric car? Less for sure, but it probably starts to close that 10x number.
- 6y ago