> It's ugly and hard to read, hard to parse and hard to follow (IMHO) I could say the same about C++, it usually comes down to what you learned first. But I d

> It's ugly and hard to read, hard to parse and hard to follow (IMHO) I could say the same about C++, it usually comes down to what you learned first. But I disagree about less people being capable of writing it. I don't have any stats to back this up but for developers new to systems programming, Rust is more approachable than C++. The compiler does much more work in ensuring you don't screw up.