3 ms·
It could be, I believe what you say is very much the truth. But that doesn't really matter. Even by doing that. these two are associated. Imagine, if there was
by vetinari 6y ago
It could be, I believe what you say is very much the truth.
But that doesn't really matter. Even by doing that. these two are associated. Imagine, if there was a non-profit, that took money from some Kremlin or Fobidden City development program, using exactly the same procedure. Would be that non-profit trustworthy going forward, given their association?
So this one is the same, just with red and white stripes. Definitely not FUD, they did take money from US Gov agency.
- eganist 6y ago> Would be that non-profit trustworthy going forward, given their association? Kinda depends. If the money was authorized by a parliamentary body (with clear legal text around who's receiving funding, what the conditions are, etc), I wouldn't be so worried. If it was authorized by an executive as a disbursement from a random pot, I'd be more worried about strings. Ergo my comfort with US congressional funding v. a DARPA grant or In-Q-Tel investment.
- approxim8ion 6y ago>Would be that non-profit trustworthy going forward, given their association? As long as the product is proprietary, no.