There’s a lot of throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks in this article. It also conflates things in its comparisons, like comparing AI to pharmaceu

There’s a lot of throwing things at the wall and seeing what sticks in this article. It also conflates things in its comparisons, like comparing AI to pharmaceuticals. We don’t ingest algorithms and a much better comparison would be to a non FDA regulated lab test, many of which exist. The lie detector comparison is also odd. We never regulated lie detectors, we simply barred their use in courtrooms because their results are unreliable. This is I think the core issue I have with articles like this - if we talk about regulation, we should talk about regulating outcomes, not underlying tech. There was no talk of regulating skin conductivity devices after polygraphs were barred from evidence.