3 ms·
This sounds like it was explicitly to get around the trigger clauses in the contract. They likely had acceleration for change of control, and fired people befor
by mrkurt 15y ago
This sounds like it was explicitly to get around the trigger clauses in the contract. They likely had acceleration for change of control, and fired people before the "event" that would have triggered that acceleration.
- shimon 15y agoDon't these contracts typically require termination with cause in order to interrupt vesting? Not that that's a perfect solution, but it should at least make these more blatant acts a bit easier to pursue in court.
- bediger 15y agoI bet that the "with cause" part would be pretty easy to find. Every company I've worked for that had official policies wrote them so vaguely and all encompassing that every single employee was in violation. Some of the "don't introduce 3rd party software to the network" policies, when read strictly, make every single developer who writes a small automation script a violator of the policy.