3 ms·
Your point has changed at least twice in this thread. My point was simply that "monopoly" is not an accurate term here. You can't say "oligopoly may be more a
by greggyb 6y ago
Your point has changed at least twice in this thread.
My point was simply that "monopoly" is not an accurate term here.
You can't say "oligopoly may be more accurate, so I've been correct."
- throwanem 6y agoSure I can! You're quibbling over my choice of a single, admittedly inexact but contextually plain, word, rather than engage at all with the actual point I made. I'm just trying to meet you where you are.
- JumpCrisscross 6y ago> a single, admittedly inexact but contextually plain, word Within the context of a policy discussion, a monopoly versus oligopoly is a pretty material difference. Every growing business at some level “wants” to monopolise their niche.
- Nevermark 6y agoYou are still not addressing the point despite wording clarifications that addressed your original quibbles.
- greggyb 6y agoYou're responding to someone else now. I'll quote myself: > I don't really have much to disagree with you about, but maybe you want to check the "monopoly" claim. If you want to have a debate, we can. Name something you want to disagree on.