4 ms·
I don't think your analogy holds good here. Combat sports is between highly trained professionals, with very strict rules. You don't see a 125 pound man fightin
by akudha 6y ago
I don't think your analogy holds good here. Combat sports is between highly trained professionals, with very strict rules. You don't see a 125 pound man fighting a 250 pound man in UFC, do you? There are no such rules in a casino. Everything in a casino is rigged against its patrons. It is not a level playing field. You can gamble away all your life's earnings in one evening if you wanted to. If there are rules like one cannot gamble more than 5% of their net worth, one cannot continue gambling if they lost x amount of dollars in x amount of time... or something along those lines, then maybe we can compare casinos with combat sports.
Don't forget that gambling is also highly addictive.
We may not like American football, beauty pageants etc. But at least those are level playing fields and not addictive
- aeternum 6y agoIn some ways, combat sports might be worse. Athletes are gambling with their bodies in return for potential monetary reward, and most don't even make it into the big leagues. With casinos, at least they only lose money and are unlikely to have to live with lifelong injuries.
- akudha 6y agoYou’re missing the point. Athletes are gambling with their health, yes. But they have a 50-50 chance of winning or losing. Casinos are not 50-50. They are rigged against their customers. I wouldn’t have a problem with gambling if the odds are even. Also, combat sports are not addictive, gambling is.