> Because we're talking about him and not about free software. It's that simple. No it's not that simple. Because the other side of this is that we are talking

> Because we're talking about him and not about free software. It's that simple. No it's not that simple. Because the other side of this is that we are talking about Free Software because of him, indluding his personality. Few people would stand up for this thankless job. Few people would have created and promoted the GPL. We are taling about RMS because some people decided to attack him unfairly. There may be people better suited for the job. But that is a different argument from the one you made.