3 ms·
That is the most generous possible interpretation, and frankly, I do not think it's supported by the actually linked text. The only line that could be interpre
by truculent 6y ago
That is the most generous possible interpretation, and frankly, I do not think it's supported by the actually linked text.
The only line that could be interpreted in that way would be:
> This "child pornography" might be a photo of yourself or your lover that the two of you shared.
And even then, it is ambiguous.