3 ms·
I thought that the distributed part wasn't opensourced.
by ma2rten 6y ago
I thought that the distributed part wasn't opensourced.
- qbasic_forever 6y agoFor the cache: https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/remote-caching.html https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/remote-caching.html and https://github.com/buchgr/bazel-remote https://github.com/buchgr/bazel-remote You can actually just set it up to use a shared S3 bucket to hold the cache. For builds there are a few options to check out: https://github.com/jin/awesome-bazel#remote-caching-and-execution https://github.com/jin/awesome-bazel#remote-caching-and-exec...
- londons_explore 6y agoThat all looks like a massive security vulnerability. Anyone with write access to the cache can upload a malicious build artifact and end up getting it compiled into everyone else's binaries, effectively giving them access to act as any developer or the ability to get their code sneaked into a release undetected. The page doesn't describe that risk at all!