Is this encouraging governments to insist on access to Signal, adding risk to their core product? Assuming govt haven't already, or that number is limited, addi

Is this encouraging governments to insist on access to Signal, adding risk to their core product? Assuming govt haven't already, or that number is limited, adding hidden transactions seems a great was for increased government attention. Side point, I think one of the greatest and less discussed risks of crypto is government. Its hard to see them allowing loss of currency control. Currency is so economically important for control & profitable e.g. There much talk the support on the attacks on Libya/Gadhafi was in part due to his desire for an independent currency. So unless crypto spreads so widely pre-regulation its politically unviable to move against, I wonder if we will see governments step in against crypto, at least as a day-to-day transaction option at some point.