I’ll give the guy the benefit of the doubt. The outcome is slightly mischaracterized with regard to who’s in agree about the facts. There’s clearly some unresol

I’ll give the guy the benefit of the doubt. The outcome is slightly mischaracterized with regard to who’s in agree about the facts. There’s clearly some unresolved issues about what exactly happened as the brief makes clear. Exactly what was said at the hearing following the event was not recorded and the events following are a he said, she said according to the judges opinion. I believe there shouldn’t have been a hearing in the first place. If it’s true that he was argumentative and disrespectful towards those in authority that’s always a good way to get yourself in trouble regardless if you’re right or wrong. My thoughts are that there probably shouldn’t have been a hearing and that he handled it poorly even though it shouldn’t have happened. Should that be blamed on “the left’s” intolerance? Idk.