5 ms·
Signal is actively working on other identifiers than a phone number, but can you cite proof that no phone will be required at all? I got the impression that Sig
by Mediterraneo10 6y ago
Signal is actively working on other identifiers than a phone number, but can you cite proof that no phone will be required at all? I got the impression that Signal will still require a phone number at signup to do SMS verification, and only then give you a way to provide non-phone-number identifiers to contacts.
- Klonoar 6y agoEh, fair. I cannot cite proof, only note that every instance I've seen Signal promise this feature has been worded in a way that indicates no phone number would be required. It is unfortunate that I don't see many from Signal on this forum, as it'd be nice if someone would just clarify this already considering the popularity of it as a feature request.
- pixxel 6y agoNot from Signal but the MobileCoin CEO posted this answer yesterday. ..... >>The UK also has receiver verification. If I try to send to an account and it doesn't match the name I'm sending to, my bank will warn me. How do you stop impersonation? A: Signal relies on phone numbers for identities. Other apps that integrate MobileCoin may have a higher threshold for identification. ..... Reads to me like phone numbers are not going away.