5 ms·
But modern techniques exist to deal with problems in a large die (ie testing and then segmenting off cores with mistakes on them), so the fact they’re starting
by Robotbeat 6y ago
But modern techniques exist to deal with problems in a large die (ie testing and then segmenting off cores with mistakes on them), so the fact they’re starting with large chip die sizes doesn’t really tell you much, no?
- erik 6y agoThe top end most profitable SKUs are fully enabled dies. That they are now able to ship dies this large is a good sign. The 10nm laptop chips they have produced so far were rumored to have atrocious yield.
- JudasGoat 6y ago"The top end most profitable SKUs are fully enabled dies." If you take a part that would be discarded because it didn't make "top end" binning, and sell it as a lesser(core count or clock speed) chip. Isn't that profit from what would otherwise be scrap?
- Tuna-Fish 6y agoDie harvesting is not perfect. If there is an error in a logic transistor, they can turn off that cpu core and use the rest of the chip. If there is a short between ground and power, the whole chip is useless because it will melt when you plug it in. Yields on larger chips are still substantially worse than smaller chips, even with harvesting.
- Robotbeat 6y agoInteresting, that’s informative. Well that sounds like a big advantage for the chiplet approach.