3 ms·
The worst and most common argument I’ve heard for the daily standup is that it somehow facilitates team bonding and and passive, “osmosis-like” transfer of know
by brhsagain 6y ago
The worst and most common argument I’ve heard for the daily standup is that it somehow facilitates team bonding and and passive, “osmosis-like” transfer of knowledge.
Like... why would you ever do x with the vague intention of getting y as a side benefit? Why don’t you just do y directly?
I frankly don’t care what my teammates are up to. I don’t care what the team is up to. It’s not my job to care. It’s my job to send commits and get paid. If I need to collaborate with a teammate why wouldn’t I just reach out directly? If I need “context” about something, whether it’s company goals or how some piece in the code works, why don’t I just have a meeting specifically about that? If we want team bonding why don’t we have the team bond over actually working together in real ways?
I hate this culture of by default having all these regular meetings for no explicit reason.
- PicassoCTs 6y agoRituals have the nice effect of distributing the felt guilt for failure and distributing the pressure of decisions. Thus, there will always be a priest, there will always be a king, there will always be a congregation viewing the absolution of the ruler.
- pseudalopex 6y agoThe same argument is used for open floor plans and Slack.