3 ms·
CoffeeKup is great for layouts, but it's very Haml-esque. I think it suffers from many of the issues described in "Haml Sucks for Content" (http://chriseppstein
by TrevorBurnham 15y ago
CoffeeKup is great for layouts, but it's very Haml-esque. I think it suffers from many of the issues described in "Haml Sucks for Content" (http://chriseppstein.github.com/blog/2010/02/08/haml-sucks-for-content/ http://chriseppstein.github.com/blog/2010/02/08/haml-sucks-f...). Markdown/Textile are really better-suited to a wiki.
- jjm 15y agoI agree, just wanted to see a pure JS dependent solution for a JS project. Know what I mean?
- TrevorBurnham 15y agoWell, there are JS implementations of both Markdown and Textile: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1319657/javascript-to-convert-markdown-textile-to-html-and-ideally-back-to-markdown-te http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1319657/javascript-to-con... It would be cool if the site used one of these, since then you could view the markup of a page and see how markup changes would affect that page in real-time.