3 ms·

You're thinking of Mesosphere, a separate company building a product on top of Mesos.

• benjaminwootton 6y ago
  True. As the major corporate sponsor though they didn’t give it the best chance. I ran one of the first Docker partners and saw first hand how both Mesos and Docker Inc had considerable mindset and interest from large enterprises for a year or so before Kubernetes matured. They both spectacularly failed to deliver through arrogance and bad execution.
  • pm90 6y ago
    I remember visiting SFBA in 2014 or so, a friend worked in PayPal said they used mesos, kubernetes was a baby project with a lot of hype. It sure seemed mesos had won back then, and the fact that kubernetes caught up, surpassed and then succeeded so wildly would have never crossed my mind.
    • smarterclayton 6y ago
      I worked with tech companies and some banks in the early days of Kubernetes who were deep in Mesos and many of them felt the same way. It’s really hard to see this as it’s happening. Kubernetes is absolutely “worse is better” when it comes to scheduling. But scheduling isn’t the problem most people needed solved. Kubernetes standardized deployment patterns of multiple apps well for most people. Everything else was a nice to have (scheduling, scale, ease of initial setup, etc).