2 ms·
I don't think it's quite the same. I'm saying sports, arts and music got to such heights, that an ordinary person can consume nothing but the best 0.1%. This i
by dale_glass 6y ago
I don't think it's quite the same.
I'm saying sports, arts and music got to such heights, that an ordinary person can consume nothing but the best 0.1%. This in turn means the demand for the rest has plummeted, and being the guy who can play guitar "okay" doesn't really excite anybody anymore. There's a market at the very high end, and nobody wants to pay a cent for anything below that.
Programming is going the opposite way, if anything. There's lots and lots of programming grunt work that just needs to be done by somebody and doesn't take any particular skill. There's rather less need for wizards able to squeeze every possible bit of functionality into 64K, because at this point resources are cheap.
At this point a programmer can get by with being moderately competent and doing little other than gluing frameworks together. Things like music are the opposite. Mere competence is nowhere near enough.
- Ekaros 6y agoProgramming itself is relatively low on the ladder. Generic CRUD, and clue code doesn't require very specialised skills. On other hand for that work to be useful proper software engineering and architecture is needed. And these hopefully take input from computer science.