3 ms·
No, it was always above the background level (at least in several EU member states) and this has not changed. See e.g. German data from 3 weeks ago: > The num
by Pyramus 6y ago
No, it was always above the background level (at least in several EU member states) and this has not changed.
See e.g. German data from 3 weeks ago:
> The number of these cases after vaccination with COVID-19 AstraZeneca is statistically significantly higher than the number of cerebral venous thromboses that normally occur in the unvaccinated population. For this purpose, an observed-versus-expected analysis was performed, comparing the number of cases expected without vaccination in a 14-day time window with the number of cases reported after approximately 1.6 million AstraZeneca vaccinations in Germany. About one case would have been expected, and seven cases had been reported.
https://www.pei.de/EN/service/faq/coronavirus/faq-coronavirus-node.html https://www.pei.de/EN/service/faq/coronavirus/faq-coronaviru...
- runeks 6y agoWouldn’t it make more sense to compare it to being injected with some other substance, instead of comparing it to “not being injected with anything at all”? I’m certainly no doctor, but I assume there is some risk associated with injecting a substance into the body. It would be very interesting to see the rate of similar blood clots for various vaccines/medications injected in the same manner as the AZ vaccine.