3 ms·
xonsh worked poorly with curses based applications when I tried it a while ago.
by ok123456 6y ago
xonsh worked poorly with curses based applications when I tried it a while ago.
- nyanpasu64 6y agoLast time I tried, it manually "passed through" nano to avoid broken keyboard handling, but you had to add micro, makepkg, sudoedit... to the list, you had to exclude every "top-level binary" that either supplied or invoked a console-based text editor, from xonsh's specialized handling.
- ok123456 6y agohaving to whitelist and blacklist things which need to do cooked terminal IO is not a good situation.
- BeetleB 6y agoI had this problem when I first switched to it, but the solution was in the Github issues. I don't know if it's a problem with the newer releases.