> Why would the rich be prosocial if they're treated as antisocial regardless. They might as well behave nefariously and reap those rewards if people are going

> Why would the rich be prosocial if they're treated as antisocial regardless. They might as well behave nefariously and reap those rewards if people are going to treat them as an increased liability. Because you should do the right thing, even if no one is watching. Even if there's no reward - or even if you lose a reward! That's the basic demand of being a moral human being, so I think it's pretty easy to say "the rich" should be prosocial regardless of how they're regarded.