3 ms·
> How does this replace a Git web interface, though? It doesn't. And it shouldn't. I don't need code browsing on my SMB repo because, well, I'm the only one w
by MrGilbert 6y ago
> How does this replace a Git web interface, though?
It doesn't. And it shouldn't.
I don't need code browsing on my SMB repo because, well, I'm the only one working on it. And even if I weren't, it'd be kinda fine anyways. I don't have the extra layer of security, but I don't need that either: I already need credentials to connect to my SMB share.
PRs - well, single project. It's just for me, so merging my own feature branches seems fine.
Issues are indeed an "issue". I simply track them in a markdown file. Whatever floats your boat should be fine, though. Combined, for me personally, it works better than managing a platform I don't really need.
- lordgroff 6y agoFor issues, there's git-bug: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
- MrGilbert 6y agoThat's nice, thanks!
- robertlagrant 6y agoIt makes sense that most distributed version control system features wouldn't apply to a single user.