3 ms·
> and the maintainers seem to disagree they exist, which is a shame Does this extend also to the case of when someone submits a pull request to them, or only f
by codetrotter 6y ago
> and the maintainers seem to disagree they exist, which is a shame
Does this extend also to the case of when someone submits a pull request to them, or only for issues that people file?
If the former then it is truly problematic. If the latter they may be simply overworked/overburdened by the volume of issues that are being filed, and could need more people submitting pull requests instead of opening issues.
- MrGilbert 6y ago> If the latter they may be simply overworked/overburdened by the volume of issues that are being filed, and could need more people submitting pull requests instead of opening issues. Although merging and reviewing a pull request can also be quite time-consuming. If you are already overworked, it might add to the problem. I'm happy that none of my open-source projects went through the roof. I won't be able to manage it alone.
- junon 6y agoThey aren't saying "we can't fix this right now". They're saying, straight up, "this isn't a problem".
- freeopinion 6y agoPictures or it didn't happen. One of the maintainers has responded specifically to you here and you have ignored their outreach.
- oarsinsync 6y ago> One of the maintainers has responded specifically to you here and you have ignored their outreach. The maintainer has responded more recently than the GP's last comment. "ignore" feels like a stretch.
- junon 6y agoLol, "ignored". Why are you so angry? I don't check HN every waking minute of every day. In fact, I have noprocrast enabled, so I can't. Please stop assuming malice in others. You'll be a happier person. I've responded to the dev, FWIW.