The actual text also contains > Findings of these studies suggest that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection via the fomite transmission route is low, and generally

The actual text also contains > Findings of these studies suggest that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection via the fomite transmission route is low, and generally less than 1 in 10,000, which means that each contact with a contaminated surface has less than a 1 in 10,000 chance of causing an infection [7], [8], [9]. How is that not only misleading, but "very" misleading? The headline appears directly in the text almost word-for-word. And the conclusion I drew from the headline seems about right. At worst, I think someone could miss the context of "each contact" with a contaminated surface, but I still wouldn't call this very misleading.