3 ms·
It was not "promoted in the Eastern bloc". People from those regions could sign it under their real names without repercussions. The anti-Stallman letter is si
by flapq 6y ago
It was not "promoted in the Eastern bloc". People from those regions could sign it under their real names without repercussions.
The anti-Stallman letter is signed by the usual SJW developers who jump at any chance to cancel someone. Some of these went straight to positions of power in projects without having contributed anything of value.
These developers represent less than 5% of projects, the other 95% either does not care or is scared to sign the pro-Stallman letter.
- a1369209993 6y ago> People from those regions could sign it under their real names without repercussions. Precisely this; conversely, many people who signed the anti-Stallman letter were in positions where they would risk repercussions for not signing it, though it's (by design) hard to be sure to what extent that's why they signed it. > either does not care To be fair, I suspect >50% fall into this category.
- jordigh 6y ago> It was not "promoted in the Eastern bloc" Yes it was, the counterletter was posted on Russian forums a number of times, and it was regularly promoted in 4chan's /g/ too, where it was also drafted. There's probably still /g/ threads promoting the counterletter right now, as this is a cause celebre for 4chan. It's a 4chan-written letter promoted in the Russian-speaking internet. Russia has a well-documented state-sponsored homophobia and that attitude trickles down to many of her citizens in various ways.