3 ms·
It’s valid because GitHub is using cycles on format when the functionality is more important. I think these new formats are nice, but don’t care give how hard
by prepend 6y ago
It’s valid because GitHub is using cycles on format when the functionality is more important.
I think these new formats are nice, but don’t care give how hard to use their token scheme is. Just some mention of other stuff coming would be nice.
The problem I have is I’m not even sure if GitHub recognizes this as a problem (I have to grant access to every repo I can access to every script) and it’s been broken for years. Would be nice to know what they’re working on.
- threeseed 6y agoThis is what they are working on: https://github.blog/changelog/ https://github.blog/changelog/ It seems to me that its a PM centric process i.e. lots of end-user features rather than fixing the behind the scenes parts that are poorly designed and/or broken. We tried to workaround the inadequate token support by using their Terraform module for automation. Only for it to delete our repos losing years of issues because of a bug where renaming = deleting (3 year old issue that has never been prioritised).