Well the Magazine calls itself "[__] Review of Journalism" and many of the articles seem to start with a story about a specific journalist that is exemplary for

Well the Magazine calls itself "[__] Review of Journalism" and many of the articles seem to start with a story about a specific journalist that is exemplary for the topic. It's a brand thing. If you really dislike it, then this magazine is not for you. Personally this narrative oriented style has me on edge about rhetoric subterfuge. It feels like a sleight of hand, like a Kansas City shuffle, like a trick to fly fiction, an advertorial, or opinion below the radar.