3 ms·
I personally "online"-know people where I have no doubt they share their porn with consent of everybody involved (e.g. they often hold signs up with messages fo
by rndgermandude 6y ago
I personally "online"-know people where I have no doubt they share their porn with consent of everybody involved (e.g. they often hold signs up with messages for their fans), but who at the same time would never share their identity because of the social repercussions if certain neighbors or coworkers or their families learned about their "hobby".
Same as reddit's r/gonewild really, where posters would verify themselves with handwritten signs, but most would never even dream of handing over a copy of their driver's license to moderators or reddit.
I'd argue such a "sign-holding" verification method in regards to consent is far more conclusive and secure than any checkbox + copy-of-some-id method ever could be, and yet every campaigner/activist out there seems to rave on about real names and government id, which is a worse method that also comes with a huge chilling effect.
(I also happen to know that a lot of horny husbands share the ids of their wives with other people. I am not condoning that in any way. But of course is another way other than hacks where verification by government id can go horribly wrong)