3 ms·
No, you mentioned things Google didn't implement. That's not the same as making it incompatible. In this case that would be Google adding things to Java, not sk
by Daho0n 6y ago
No, you mentioned things Google didn't implement. That's not the same as making it incompatible. In this case that would be Google adding things to Java, not skipping some.
- BoorishBears 6y agoWhat on earth are you on about? Not supporting random parts of a contract programs rely on to function makes your platform incompatible. Especially when you claim support for an update but then randomly cut out parts of the functionality. In what universe does incompatibility somehow require... adding "things"... like what? I don't have much patience for people so out of their depth they don't understand the table stakes for a meaningful conversation on a topic.