3 ms·
Let's say hypothetically John Smith makes $500k/year as a software consultant. Instead of being paid directly he starts John Smith Inc. and routes his income th
by nodamage 6y ago
Let's say hypothetically John Smith makes $500k/year as a software consultant. Instead of being paid directly he starts John Smith Inc. and routes his income through his corporation. He withdraws $100k/year in dividends to pay his living expenses which is paid under capital gains rates, the other $400k/year is invested in the stock market and grows tax-free forever inside the tax-sheltered corporation. The vast majority of John Smith's income will never be taxed as he only needs to withdraw enough in dividends every year to cover his living expenses.
- tomp 6y agoWhat exactly is the problem here? How is this meaningfully different from investing your own post-tax $500k into the market and growing it forever? If you dislike this situation, what you need is wealth tax, not profit tax. As the value of John Smith Inc. grows over time, John Smith the person will have to pay increasing amount of wealth taxes...
- nodamage 6y ago> How is this meaningfully different from investing your own post-tax $500k into the market and growing it forever? What's the difference between investing post-tax income vs pre-tax income? The amount of income tax you paid...
- laughingbovine 6y agoI don't think you can "withdraw" money from a company you own. Probably John Smith Inc. would pay John Smith the 100k/year as a salary... a salary which is taxed. But, then again, the Planet Money article says to eliminate income tax as well. Their solution: > Instead, impose a consumption tax, designed to be progressive to protect lower-income households.
- nodamage 6y agoAs the sole shareholder of a corporation you can pay yourself $0 in salary and issue yourself $100k in dividends instead.