Come on, you cannot infer that the author has "very limited experience with shells" from an incomplete (early!) implementation. Read the rest of the thread anyw

Come on, you cannot infer that the author has "very limited experience with shells" from an incomplete (early!) implementation. Read the rest of the thread anyway, you'll understand that you are mistaken very fast. I agree that a fallback website when JS is disabled (with complete relevant content) would be good (progressive enhancement), with a hint that one may want to try enabling Javascript for fun.