You say the alternative is bad but stop short of evaluating how bad. There's clearly a difference here and you don't seem to shy away from giving an opinion yet

You say the alternative is bad but stop short of evaluating how bad. There's clearly a difference here and you don't seem to shy away from giving an opinion yet you also claim to be undecided for a court case that had lasted 10 years. I'm sorry, but this smells like a bad faith argument.